🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to reopen talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is navigating a complex route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be operating from a situation of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Prior Talks Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that concluded with the US president claiming the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states exercised their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Offered

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the talks that US nuclear scientists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed repeatedly they had secured an understanding with the US representative the American negotiator only for the deal to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Iranian officials stated the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in some form if negotiations resume.

The American leader in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of inactivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement revealed the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the attacks started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were carried out with full US knowledge and cooperation, making confidence challenging to restore.

Negotiations Remains the Final Solution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently tried to dictate their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and remains the ultimate answer to settle disputes, but its requirements, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"Provided that they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will get a answer in the same language."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, stays intact. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."