🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Clash Regarding System and Philosophy

For example, this was the director , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire a coach who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, yet finally accountable should it be delivered cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for using too much that system. Hire the process guy and later bin him for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.